December 2 2017 – Philosophy As Therapy [PAT] – Jungian or Joadian ?

http://www.ucobserver.org/society/2017/12/freud/

Move over, Freud

Philosopher-therapists are using their abstract discipline to help people lead more meaningful lives

By Ian Coutts

Who am I? What is right? How should I live my life? Everyone asks these questions at some point or another. Joanna Polley helps her clients answer them.But Polley is not a psychotherapist, nor does she use the techniques of any particular school of psychology or follow Carl Jung or Sigmund Freud or other giants of psychoanalysis. Instead, Polley’s tools are the writings and ideas of the great thinkers in the eastern and western traditions, stretching back to the ancient Greeks and ultimately to Socrates, whose directive “Know thyself” might make him history’s first therapist.

A philosophical therapist, Polley is part of a small movement of philosophers who are turning their abstract academic discipline into a method of helping people lead happier, better, more effective lives. They perhaps draw inspiration from Epicurus, the ancient Greek philosopher, who said, “There is no benefit in philosophy if it does not drive out diseases of the soul.”

Superficially, Polley’s work does resemble conventional therapy. She meets with clients in a Toronto office furnished with a sofa and a couple of comfy chairs. “I don’t see a clientele that’s very different from a regular psychotherapist,” she says. “They’re struggling with depression and always anxiety.” They’re experiencing “a general kind of malaise, and they want to work things through.”

Her approach to these issues is where the difference lies. “I don’t focus on childhood. I don’t work on the traditional things a psychotherapist works on. . . . A lot of people who come here have already worked through that stuff.” Her clients face many of the problems we all have, not necessarily because there is “something wrong,” she says, but “because we are human.”

When she meets with clients, she says, “I like to discuss what’s going on, and then I like to step out and look at it from a more philosophical position. What is the point of a human life or a career or a relationship? What is love? What is work?”

After exploring the big picture, she’ll “zoom back in on how can we apply these [questions] in making really concrete changes in their lives.” It’s an approach she characterizes as both “more abstract and more practical” than conventional therapy.

In her work, Polley draws on a range of philosophers, whom she often advises her clients to read as well. Friedrich Nietzsche, she says, is “very good for helping people to see that a lot of what they think is because our culture thinks it. They have never reflected on it or thought about it.” Aristotle is good, too. “He’s the one who really shows us that ethics is about practising ethical acts and becoming the kind of person who does ethical things.” Twentieth-century philosophers such as Jacques Derrida and Gilles Deleuze (the subjects of Polley’s doctorate) are also useful, as are examples taken from literature, including, perhaps improbably, Henry Miller, whose novels were banned in the United States for obscenity. “He encourages people to take risks and to see that life is an ongoing experiment, not in ‘What am I?’ but in ‘Who might I be?’”

On a more fundamental level, philosophical therapy challenges people’s thinking. “I support my clients, and I offer them compassion, but I also tell them when they need to check their inferences,” Polley says. “I tell them, ‘No, your reasoning is faulty.’ People need to be told they’re thinking incorrectly or not carefully enough. Or in a very limited way.”

Some of Polley’s clients seek her out with specific ethical dilemmas — whether to terminate a pregnancy, for example — and stay with her for as little as three sessions. Others work with her for a year or more. The bulk of her clients are women in their 20s. “When I first started this [six years ago], I thought I would get a lot of people in mid-life crisis . . . people who are a little bit older and starting to reflect on their lives and wondering what it’s all about.”

Michael Collister, whose name has been changed, is a client of Polley’s who is in his mid-60s. A retired lawyer, Collister says he had “completed a fairly successful career, if you define success by how society defines success.” But he worried. “I didn’t want to just have the rest of my life evaporate with no purpose.” Over the course of three months, Collister and Polley met regularly. Readings included Nietzsche, Immanuel Kant and Viktor Frankl.

For Collister, the biggest difference between philosophical therapy and conventional therapy is orientation. “Psychoanalysis is all about you,” he says. “That has its place, but there’s this quote from Bertrand Russell that goes basically, ‘Until I looked outside myself, I wasn’t happy.’” (In his book The Conquest of Happiness, Russell writes that his own happiness came “very largely . . . due to a diminishing preoccupation with myself.”) Thanks to his work with Polley and his own reading, Collister has found a new purpose: researching inequality “and how we, as a society, need to think about how we’re organized to address what I think is going to be a very significant problem in the future.”

Contemporary philosophical therapy has roots in early-1980s Europe, where individuals trained in philosophy began working with clients outside university departments. Today, it has a complicated relationship with its institutional counterpart, with some academic philosophers speaking critically about the therapeutic branch of their discipline.

In an article in The Point, Tom Stern, who teaches philosophy at University College London in England, writes that a therapeutic approach to philosophy, taken too far, “finds it difficult to tell you that you are wrong about something. You are told . . . that you are ‘the expert’ about what matters to you, that there’s ‘no intrinsically good or bad thing to do,’ that what matters is the ‘meaning and purpose’ that you put on it. . . . You can be misled, on the wrong path, disoriented, hindered, distracted. But you can never just be wrong.” Ultimately, Stern asserts that “philosophy questions” and “life questions” — the search for truth and the search for fulfilment — aren’t so easily combined.

Mark Kingwell, a philosophy professor at the University of Toronto, admits most graduate students in his department lack interest in anything but academic jobs. They feel, Kingwell says, that “if you don’t achieve that outcome, somehow you’ve failed.” It is also unlikely, he adds, that philosophical therapy “could be taught in the kind of philosophy department that’s currently the mainstream.”

Interestingly, Peter Raabe at the University of the Fraser Valley in Abbotsford, B.C., does teach what might be called philosophical therapy. But while his course is offered by the philosophy department, it is specifically intended for future mental health-care workers.

Polley is undaunted in her mission to encourage more philosophers to consider offering counselling. Ultimately, she’d like to see the creation of a Canadian professional organization for philosophical therapists. (At present, she and many of her counterparts are certified by the American Philosophical Practitioners Association.) Then, she thinks, they could co-ordinate with the university departments and say to the students, “Here is an option for you.”

It wouldn’t represent a radical new direction so much as a return to philosophy’s roots, to Epictetus and Seneca, so-called Stoics who saw philosophy not as an abstract pastime but a concrete, hands-on tool to help make sense of life and the world.

“The Stoics were the ones who believed in philosophical practice,” says Polley, “and then it sort of got lost.”

Ian Coutts is a writer in Kingston, Ont.

Advertisements
Featured post

Trump, Joad and Nuclear War – Daily Mail Front Page “How Scared Should We Be?” – April 12 2017 + Letter “Hear! Hear!” by Richard W. Symonds

17884372_1594200023926827_6419844588074093427_n

IMG_6781.JPG

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170412/282497183527162

Dear Editor
 

As Trump’s America plays its own potentially-catastrophic global war game, we would do well to remember a forgotten English philosopher and writer – C.E.M. Joad (1891-1953) – whose work is exhibited at the Arundel Museum this week (‘The Joadian Way’ Exhibition – April 7-14).

67 years ago, in June 1950 at the start of the Cold War, Joad won an Oxford Union Debate against Randolph Churchill – chaired by Robin Day [an Oxford ‘stringer’ for Time magazine which later covered the debate under the heading “Heading for Hell?”]:

“That this House regrets the influence exercised by the U.S. as the dominant power among the democratic nations”.

 
 
Yours sincerely
 
 
Richard W. Symonds
The Joad Society
 
2 Lychgate Cottages
Ifield Street, Ifield Village
Crawley, West Sussex RH11 0HX
 
Tel: 07540 309592 (Text only – Very deaf)

“The Joadian Way” – Ramblette and Exhibition 2017

 

 IMG_6681.JPG

The Joadian Way Ramblette

download
C.E.M. Joad

Described as “possibly the most beautiful short walk in the South Downs National Park”, the Joadian Way Ramblette took place the weekend before Easter – Saturday April 8 – to mark the 64th Anniversary of South Downs philosopher and writer C.E.M. Joad (1891-1953), who became famous in the wartime Brains Trust.

Starting from Amberley Station at 11am, the short walk passes through North Stoke near the South Downs Way (with its unique red Telephone Box/Information Point), and then on to South Stoke where Joad wrote many of his 100+ books in the 1940’s.

img_4262 (4).jpg

Distance : 5.3m (8.5k) – 2 hour walk (round-trip).
Terrain : Grass footpath and track (muddy and slippery in parts). Good walking boots strongly advised. A few hills.
Where to park : Amberley Station (off the B 2139)
IMG_6593
Amberley Station
ROUTE
IMG_63871. Start from the Heritage Trail sign on the wall at Amberley Station, with the Amberley Working Museum opposite. This small village, called Houghton Bridge, is located on the banks of the river Arun and is home to, rather confusingly, both Amberley museum and train station.
IMG_63902. Head out of the Amberley Station and immediately cross the busy road – with care. Walk left towards Houghton Bridge [a walk right would go Amberley Village – a good walk from the station].
Don’t miss the small signpost of the Chichester-Horsham Literary Trail to the right [Ref: “West Sussex Literary Trail” by Peter Anderson & Keith McKenna – Per-Rambulations 2007].
IMG_7075
turnpike3. Reach the white Turnpike Toll House. just before the bridge.

Here it is best to do a little ‘imagineering’ and go back in time to 1814 – over 200 years ago. Imagine no trains, no cars and no restaurants – just boats and a bridge over the river. The only means of crossing the river was the bridge – thus the Toll House to charge for crossing it.

Houghton Bridge was built in 1813, with John Davis being the first Toll “Keeper”. He started work on April 1 1814 and received eight shillings per week.

Toll-HouseTurnpike tolls raised £70 to £80 per year. The charge of two shillings was made “for every 4-wheeled Wagon, Wain, Cart drawn by 8 horses”; two shillings for “Coach, Chariot, Landau, Berlin chaise, Curricule, Calah, Hearse or other such carriage drawn by six horses or other beasts”; and “for every drove of calves, swine, sheep or lambs sum of 10d [pence] per score”.

“For any use on a Sunday – Double Toll”.

bridgeThe bridge itself was rebuilt in 1875 by landowners which included the Duke of Norfolk (Arundel Castle) and Lord Leconfield (Petworth House).

 4. Carefully go half-way across the bridge, and cross the road at the footpath signpost on the other side. Then follow the path to the river.
IMG_65225. Follow the grass path along the river – “The Riverbank Walk”. Keep a look out for the different varieties of wildlife which frequent the River Arun throughout the year – as well as the occasional fisherman
After going over a stile, immediately turn left over another stile (by the small lock). Walk to the end of this narrow, hedged footpath which is often very muddy and slippery. Take extra care here. The road will finally be reached
6. red-tel-boxTurn right and walk up the road until a bright red telephone box is reached at North Stoke. (which has been transformed into a miniature Tourist Information Centre!). This is what it was like before the transformation by the Wiggonholt Association.
At this point, take a rest after the slow climb up the road. Look inside the telephone and do some more ‘imagineering’ – yes, it’s a small Tardis!
IMG_6588
There might be two horses in the field behind. They are very friendly – especially if some grass is offered to them.
IMG_6664 (1)
 7. At the Telephone Box/Information Point, turn right along the road by the farm.
 8. Follow the road until you reach North Stoke Farm House
IMG_6662 (1)
st mary photo john vigar
Photo by John Vigar [Hat-Tip: Janet Aidin]
and  North Stoke Church,
IMG_6651 (1)
St Mary’s Church, North Stoke

IMG_6660

Then come back the same way, and just after the red telephone box take the signposted footpath to the right.
red-tel-box

9. The narrow footpath brings you out on to the grand vista of the South Downs.

IMG_6589

Go straight across the field to the wooded area (any cows, sheep or horses therein are likely to be very curious).

10. Follow the footpath through the woods and cross over the Gurkha Bridge
IMG_6374
11. Keep along the path, noticing the Knobbled Tree on the left (easily missed!)
IMG_6398
 Continue walking until the river is reached. Turn left after the turnstile, and walk along the river towards the the white bridge
IMG_6624
The Bridge

South Stoke Farm and St Leonard’s Church can be seen on the other side of the Arun.

photo (34)
12. Cross over the Bridge
IMG_6392
South Stoke Farm looking West
IMG_6649 (1)
Arun Valley Line looking East
 And follow the track into South Stoke Village.
13. Pass the Old Rectory and St Leonard’s Church
IMG_6628
St Leonard’s Church

In the cemetery, look out for “The Still Point” inscription by TS Eliot on the gravestone of John and Joanna Haggarty.

IMG_6630
This author came to understand a little more about “The Still Point” at the Knobbled Tree (see Point 11.).
Walk on to the Chapel Barn and South Stoke Farm [from where CEM Joad wrote many of his 100+ books, and is the farm in his posthumous work of fiction “Folly Farm”].
IMG_6636
Chapel Barn
IMG_6641
IMG_6640
South Stoke Farm
IMG_6643
Lambing Season on this busy working farm
IMG_6393
C.E.M. Joad (working in South Stoke Farm in 1943 – Candle-holder still used for Village events)
IMG_6428
Photo Postcard taken by Chris Clarke [looking from the South-West towards the North-East] – South Stoke Farm and Chapel Barn to the left, and St Leonard’s Church to the right.
14. Return to Amberley Station/Houghton Bridge by walking back to North Stoke. At its Telephone Box/Information Point turn right, then keep walking along the road running parallel with the railway line towards the station.
15. Pass the Chalkpit tunnel (from where scenes of the James Bond film “A View to a Kill” were shot – starring Roger Moore and Grace Jones)
IMG_6386
IMG_6389
Pass the Old School House to the right
IMG_6399
and the Old Cannon to the left (down by the river)
IMG_6400
until the Bridge Inn is reached [made famous by Hilaire Belloc’s “The Four Men”]
The Joadian Way Ramblette ends here.
Time for lunch – either at The Bridge Inn or Riverside Restaurant. Excellent food and service.
IMG_6385
IMG_6402
IMG_6734
There is a Joad Archive Research Collection at West Sussex Record Office in Chichester and the Arundel Museum – with a special Display from April 7th to April 14th.
IMG_6414

IMG_6680

file (3).jpeg
Photograph by Arundel Museum’s Pauline Carder

IMG_6683

Text link to make PayPal donations to Richard Symonds

Thank you

Featured post

“Philosopher commemorated at Arundel Museum” – Littlehampton Gazette – April 6 2017 [From today, Friday, April 7th] + The Joadian Way Ramblette [Tomorrow, Saturday, April 8th]

http://www.littlehamptongazette.co.uk/news/philosopher-commemorated-at-arundel-museum-1-7899192#comments-area

Philosopher commemorated at Arundel Museum

C. E. M. Joad

C. E. M. Joad

 

The work of a philosopher, writer and wartime ‘Brains Trust’ celebrity is set to be showcased at the Arundel Museum this month.

Cyril Edwin Mitchinson Joad, a prolific writer who penned more than 100 books, lived from August 12 1891 until April 9 1953. He did a lot of his work in Sussex, where he wrote many of his books.

Joad was one of the best known British intellectuals of his time.

As a panel member of The Brains Trust, an informational BBC radio and television programme in the 1940s and 50s, Joad would enable the show’s panel of experts to answer questions sent in by the audience.

Joad passed away of cancer at the age of 61 at Easter 1953, and to mark the occasion, Arundel Museum is displaying some of the Joad Archive.

From April 7 to 14, the museum will display Joad artefacts and manuscripts, and visitors can find out what links philosophy, train travel and a Sussex farm.

Arundel Museum is almost exclusively run by volunteers who have a passion for the history of the town and its people. The exhibits have been arranged to tell the story of this historic town.

The exhibition will commemorate the passing of the ‘People’s Philosopher’ and Brains Trust broadcaster.

For more information, visit http://www.arundelmuseum.org.

To find out more about Joad, visit cemjoad.wordpress.com.

“Beautiful Walk” – Mid Sussex Times – March 16 2017

o

http://www.midsussextimes.co.uk/news/your-say/letter-beautiful-walk-1-7869121

Your letters 11:51

“BEAUTIFUL WALK”

Thursday 16 March 2017

img_4262 (3).jpg
“The Joadian Way”

Described as “probably the most beautiful short walk in the South Downs National Park”, the Joadian Way Ramblette will take place the weekend before Easter – Saturday April 8 – to mark the 64th Anniversary of South Downs philosopher and writer C.E.M. Joad (1891-1953), who became famous in the wartime Brains Trust.

Starting from Amberley Station at 11am, the short walk will pass through North Stoke near the South Downs Way (with its unique red telephone box/information point), and then on to South Stoke where Joad wrote many of his 100+ books in the 1940s.

On arrival back at Amberley Station by 12.30pm (approx), there will be an option for lunch at the Riverside Restaurant by Houghton Bridge.

All are warmly welcome. Good walking boots are strongly recommended as it is likely to be muddy in places.

Richard W Symonds

The Joad Society

Ifield

Read more at: http://www.midsussextimes.co.uk/news/your-say/letter-beautiful-walk-1-7869121

“The Joadian Way” by Clare Toole-Mackson – The Bell Magazine – Spring 2016

THE BELL MAGAZINE – SPRING 2016

“The Joadian Way”

By Clare Toole-Mackson

younger-joad
C.E.M. Joad [1891-1953]
https://cemjoad.wordpress.com/2016/02/24/the-joadian-way-the-bell-magazine-spring-2016/

CEM Joad, after whom The Joadian Way is named, was a 20th century philosopher and intellectual who frequently visited West Sussex. Clare Toole-Mackson finds out more about him and the eponymous walk.

ALTHOUGH I am an enthusiastic and reasonably knowledgeable Sussex rambler, The Joadian Way rang no bells. The South Downs Way, The Monarch’s Way – yes, but this – no. I discovered it to be an approximately 5 mile circular walk between the hamlet of South Stoke, just north of Arundel, and Amberley station, through delightful riverside and Downland scenery.

But who was this Joad, who gave the trail its name? He was a colourful and controversial intellectual figure of the 1940’s. More mature readers may remember ‘The Brains Trust, a ground-breaking BBC radio programme which began on January 1, 1941, in an attempt to improve morale in wartime Britain. Its panel, which included Julian Huxley, answered questions, frequently of a philosophical nature, sent in by listeners. C.E.M. Joad, ‘The Professor’ as he was affectionately known, was one of the original panel members. The Brains Trust became so popular that at its height the audience figures exceeded those of ‘ITMA’, the well-loved wartime comedy programme. Through the medium of the programme Joad popularised philosophy, believing that it should not be merely an academic discipline but a power in everyday life. He endeared himself to his listeners by his business-like and unpedantic style of speaking and by his fund of anecdotes and mild humour. His answers invariably began with the catchphrase “It all depends on what you mean by…” and he rapidly became a celebrity figure, as well-known in his time as George Bernard Shaw and Bertrand Russell.

A welcome escape from the pressures of life in London was provided by Joad’s regular stays at South Stoke farmhouse and at Meadow Hills, near Stedham.

He walked and grew to love the Sussex landscape and campaigned passionately to preserve the English countryside against industrial exploitation and ribbon development – an environmentalist ahead of his time. A month after his death he was quoted in The Observer in ‘Sayings Of Our Times’ – “It will be said of this generation that it found England a land of beauty and left it a land of beauty spots”. In another local connection, Joad was a regular visitor to ‘Humphrey’s’ at Greatham, the country home of the hugely hospitable Meynell family – he even played for their family cricket team.

A brief outline of Joad’s life : he was born in Durham in 1891 and had a very strict Christian upbringing. He excelled at school and Oxford University where he joined the Fabian Society, a group of socialists whose aim was to establish a democratic socialist state in Britain. His commitment to socialism was, not surprisingly, accompanied by strong pacifism and agnosticism. It was he who proposed – and won – the motion for the famous 1933 Oxford Union debate – “That this House will in no circumstances fight for its King and country”. He did however renounce his pacifism in 1940 on realising the full horror of Nazism. After University he became a Civil Servant, hoping to infuse the Service with the socialist ethos. Sixteen years later he retired and was appointed Head of the Department of Philosophy and Psychology at Birkbeck College, University of London, a post he held for 23 years. (ie from 1930 until his death in 1953 – Ed)

An amazingly prolific author, Joad wrote, introduced or edited over 100 books, pamphlets, articles and essays. Much of his writing was done during his rural seclusion at South Stoke and Stedham. As a philosopher he cannot be said to have developed an original system of thought but dedicated his books to exploring and understanding the ideas of others, as well as arguing his own, sometimes unpopular, views and opinions on subjects such as religion, politics and warfare.

[National Gallery portrait of C.E.M. Joad]

He was the author of ‘Teach Yourself Philosophy’ in that well-known and popular series of instruction manuals.

It has probably become evident that C.E.M. Joad was a multi-faceted and complex personality and inevitably there was a dark side. He did marry in 1915 and had three children but separated from his wife 6 years later. His attitude to women strikes us today as particularly perverse and unacceptable. He believed that female minds lacked objectivity and had no interest in talking to women who would not go to bed with him. He was in fact expelled from a Fabian Society summer school because of sexual misconduct!

An extraordinary and, as it proved, fatal flaw was Joad’s boast “I cheat the railway company whenever I can”. He was eventually caught travelling without a valid ticket, convicted and fined. This public humiliation had a severe effect on him and dramatically altered the course of his life. Because of his celebrity the incident made front page headlines. He was dismissed from the BBC and all his hopes for a peerage vanished.

His health deteriorated rapidly and he died of cancer in 1953, aged 61, incidentally renouncing during his illness his agnostic ways and returning to the Christianity of the Church of England.

In spite of the scandal of his latter days, C.E.M. Joad should be remembered because he made philosophy intelligible and entertainingly accessible, teaching millions of wartime BBC ‘students’ to courageously think, write and speak for themselves when confronted by abuse and misuse of power. Known familiarly as ‘The Professor’ he was never actually accorded that honour – perhaps because of a certain amount of jealousy on the part of the academic elite. He was also instrumental in causing Stephen Potter to write his book ‘Gamesmanship’ (subtitle ‘The Art of Winning Games Without Actually Cheating’!); the idea arising during a doubles tennis match. Without the foundations laid by the Brains Trust in 1940 there might not exist today such cradles of lively debate as Question Time and Any Questions.

Richard Symonds, a Founder Member of the Joad Society in West Sussex, has worked hard to re-establish C.E.M. Joad’s name and reputation in the public eye. In April 2003 he was instrumental in organising the South Stoke Festival of Thought to commemorate the 50th anniversary of Joad’s death and in 2013 at Stedham an Exhibition of Philosophy and a Brains Trust evening. I understand that plans are already in hand for the 70th anniversary in 2023. Arundel Museum has a significant Joad archive.

Many thanks to Richard Symonds and to Arundel Museum for information on which this article is based. For details of the Joadian Way, click on the link

https://cemjoad.wordpress.com/2016/01/01/the-joadian-way-amberley-station-to-south-stoke/

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑